Brick tax
King George III introduced a brick tax in Great Britain in 1784. Bricks were initially taxed at 2s 6d per thousand.
The brick tax was imposed as a means of raising revenue for the government, which was burdened by the costs of the American War of Independence and ongoing military expenditure. The tax applied to each brick manufactured, effectively increasing the cost of construction materials across the country.
Builders and architects responded in various ways to minimise the financial impact of the tax. Some resorted to producing larger bricks, thereby reducing the number needed for a given structure and lowering the overall tax liability. Others experimented with alternative building materials, including timber, stone, and earth, leading to a noticeable shift in construction practices in certain regions. The quality and uniformity of bricks also suffered, as manufacturers sought to cut costs while remaining within the bounds of the law.
The brick tax influenced the appearance of towns and cities, as decorative brickwork became less common due to its additional expense. Simple, plain facades became the norm, and the visual character of Georgian architecture was altered in areas where brick was the dominant building material. The tax remained in place for more than sixty years, only being repealed in 1850, but its effects on construction techniques and urban aesthetics were felt long after its abolition.
During its existence, the brick tax became a symbol of government interference in everyday life and was widely unpopular among builders and homeowners alike. Historical accounts suggest that some manufacturers even resorted to clandestine methods to evade the tax, such as smuggling bricks or underreporting quantities, highlighting the tensions between regulation and practical necessity in the built environment.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Tackle the decline in Welsh electrical apprenticeships
ECA calls on political parties 100 days to the Senedd elections.
Resident engagement as the key to successful retrofits
Retrofit is about people, not just buildings, from early starts to beyond handover.
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.






















